Hashcode why

When the program puts the first Name instance into the hash set, the set puts an entry for this instance into a hash bucket. The set chooses the hash bucket based on the hash value of the instance, as computed by its hashCode method. When it checks whether the second Name instance is contained in the hash set, the program chooses which bucket to search based on the hash value of the second instance.

Because the second instance is distinct from the first , it is likely to have a different hash value. Solution: If the two hash values map to different buckets, the contains method will return false. Suppose that the two Name instances map to the same bucket. All HashSet implementations that we know of have an optimization in which each entry stores the hash value of its element in addition to the element itself.

When searching for an element, the implementation selects the appropriate hash bucket and traverses its entries, comparing the hash value stored in each entry with the hash value of the desired element. Only if the two hash values are equal does the implementation check the elements for equality.

This optimization makes sense because it is usually much cheaper to compare hash codes than elements. Because of this optimization, it is not enough for the hash set to search in the right bucket; the two Name instances must have equal hash values in order for the hash set to recognize them as equal.

The canonical reference for building a production grade API with Spring. In Java, efficient hashing algorithms stand behind some of the most popular collections, such as the HashMap check out this in-depth article and the HashSet.

In this tutorial, we'll focus on how hashCode works, how it plays into collections and how to implement it correctly. Java provides a number of data structures for dealing with this issue specifically. For example, several Map interface implementations are hash tables. When using a hash table, these collections calculate the hash value for a given key using the hashCode method.

Then they use this value internally to store the data so that access operations are much more efficient. Objects that are equal according to their equals must return the same hash code. Different objects do not need to return different hash codes. This is typically implemented by converting the internal address of the object into an integer, but this implementation technique is not required by the JavaTM programming language. A naive hashCode implementation that fully adheres to the above contract is actually quite straightforward.

The User class provides custom implementations for both equals and hashCode that fully adhere to the respective contracts. Even more, there's nothing illegitimate with having hashCode returning any fixed value. However, this implementation degrades the functionality of hash tables to basically zero, as every object would be stored in the same, single bucket.

In this context, a hash table lookup is performed linearly and does not give us any real advantage. We talk more about this in Section 7. Active 1 year, 1 month ago. Viewed k times. Improve this question. Vinoth Kumar Vinoth Kumar 2, 7 7 gold badges 22 22 silver badges 13 13 bronze badges.

This question adds some more details. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. Hi Buddy.. Very nice answer but i found a very interesting link for the same with easy to understand practical example : coderanch. Thank you Aishu. Now I got clear knowledge about the hashcode with bucket related explanation. Buckets aside, hashcode is a method that the object calls to determine the order to store each object in memory. If objects are equal, then their hashcode must also be equal.

In what case would a programmer manually invoke the hashCode method? Show 1 more comment. From the Javadoc : Returns a hash code value for the object.

The general contract of hashCode is: Whenever it is invoked on the same object more than once during an execution of a Java application, the hashCode method must consistently return the same integer , provided no information used in equals comparisons on the object is modified. Community Bot 1 1 1 silver badge. John Topley John Topley k 45 45 gold badges silver badges bronze badges.

Eli Eli 1 1 silver badge 7 7 bronze badges. So the hash code is the memory address, not the message digest of the object? A hashcode is a number generated from any object.

Imagine the following simple example : On the table in front of you. Source - here. Satyajit Satyajit 6 6 silver badges 11 11 bronze badges. No it doesn't. Here are three things to keep in mind to avoid the common pitfalls. This simple system lets him find types much faster than searching in an unsorted drawer.

Source: Wikimedia Commons. In order to make your class work properly with hash-based collections and other algorithms that rely on hash codes, all hashCode implementations must stick to a simple contract.

It can be roughly summarized with this statement:. Objects that are equal must have the same hash code within a running process. This is obvious because the number of possible distinct objects is usually bigger than the number of possible hash codes 2 Thanks Lucian for pointing out this mistake! If you fail to do so, you will end up with broken objects. So you will have equal objects with different hash codes. For example, calling contains on a HashMap will return false , even though the object has been added.

Our Developer Support is here to resolve your questions.