All members in the team stand astride. Runners must first crawl under the legs of all players in the team—run forward to the turn around point —and return to tag the next person of the team who does the same thing as the first player. Play continues…. Children stand in partners in a double circle. The partners skip around the circle. On signal, the inside person stops, folds their arms and puts their legs apart. Lay a broom across two chairs for each team.
Form teams and direct them to run from the starting line to the broom, crawl under the broom without knocking it off, and then run back to the starting line where they tag the next guest in line.
Continue until each guest has had a turn. The team to finish first wins. Team formation, Players 1 stand facing the goal. Player 2 stands beside him, with his back to the goal. The two players link elbows and on the signal, the pair run to the goal and back. One person runs backward each time. The rest of the players repeat the same action until every person has a turn. Partners assume the Wheel barrow and pusher position.
On the signal, advance to the turning point where they change positions and return to the starting line. Need several balls and a bat, broom, or yardstick for each team. Put teams in separate lines rows. First child takes the ball and pushes or bats whatever you decide the ball from one end of the room to the other. They then pick up the ball with one hand and drag the broom or stick with the other… and run back to starting line.
It can be varied by the kids going backwards while pushing or batting the ball to their teams or the players hopping while going back and forth. Some ideas for Banana Relays: 1. Place the banana between the knees and hop down the course and back. Two teammates tossing the banana back and forth down the course and back. The banana under your armpit and hopping on one leg down and back.
Teammates line up in leapfrog formation and first player hops over players while holding banana and then tosses banana to next player in line to do the same. You may have to write them on a large white board so that all players will know what relay is next. Once a team has completed all these relays someone or the whole team on the team must eat the banana and the team that is done first is the winner. Use your own ideas, add to the list or use only a few ideas.
You can adjust this game to all types of players including the disabled. Need three or four balls and cones… 2. Partners are placed in file formation. Place cones at the end of the play area.
The first two partners have a soccer ball. They return passing the ball the same way.. Relay play continues in same manner. Need about five hoops 1. Line up File line… 2. The first player runs up and picks up a hoop. The other team members run up and go through the hoop.
When all are through, the leader with the hoop rushes back with the hoop. The leader hands the hoop to the second person who runs up and everyone runs through again. Give everyone the chance to be the leader. Have the children bring two shoe boxes with them. Tape the lids onto the boxes, then cut a one-inch-wide and four-inch long slit in each top. Have the contestants slip their feet into the slits in the boxes and race… The race can be individual—with all youth racing together in a horizontal line—or done as a relay.
Create groups of four or five players in file formation. The teams stand behind a line. On signal, the first person in each team runs up and crawls UNDER the first obstacle; This person obstacle does a push up holding the position. The player then jumps OVER the second obstacle and then touches the given line. This player then runs back to tag the next team member to do the same. Need: Two long ropes Divide the children into two teams, on at each end of the play area.
Learn More about the Party Time. VIEW Course. Catch up on all the latest news with our official participant newsletters. Team Competition. Official entrants in the Boston Marathon may register for the Team Competition. Follow Us. Follow all the action of the Boston Marathon on our social media channels Learn More. Related Links. In the present case, Section 42 is relevant which is extracted as below:. Power of entry, search, seizure and arrest without warrant or authorisation.
The High Court has come to the conclusion that there is breach of mandatory provisions of Section 42 1 and Section 42 2 and further Section 43 which was relied by the Special Judge for holding that there was no necessity to comply Section 42 is not applicable. We thus proceed to first examine the question as to whether there is breach of provisions of Section 42 1 and Section 42 2.
The breach of Section 42 has been found in two parts. The first part is that there is difference between the secret information recorded in Exh.
P and Exh. P and the information sent to Circle Officer, Nohar by Exh. It is useful to refer to the findings of the High Court in the above context, which is quoted below:. P the information which is stated to be received from the informer under Section 42 2 of Act or Exh. P, the information given by the informer which is stated to be recorded in the Rozanamacha, copy whereof has been sent to C. Nohar, who was the then Senior Officer, Rather, Exh.
P, the letter which was sent, it is not the copy of Exh. P, but it is the separate memo prepared of their own. From the above examination, it is not found in the present case that section 42 2 of Act, is complied with. What Section 42 2 requires is that where an officer takes down an information in writing under sub-Section 1 he shall sent a copy thereof to his immediate officer senior.
The communication Exh. P which was sent to Circle Officer, Nohar was not as per the information recorded in Exh. P 14 and Exh. Thus, no error was committed by the High Court in coming to the conclusion that there was breach of Section 42 2. Another aspect of non-compliance of Section 42 1 proviso, which has been found by the High Court needs to be adverted. Section 42 1 indicates that any authorised officer can carry out search between sun rise and sun set without warrant or authorisation.
The scheme indicates that in event the search has to be made between sun set and sun rise, the warrant would be necessary unless officer has reasons to believe that a search warrant or authorisation cannot be obtained without affording the opportunity for escape of offender which grounds of his belief has to be recorded.
In the present case, there is no case that any ground for belief as contemplated by proviso to sub-section 1 of Section 42 or Sub-section 2 of Section 42 was ever recorded by Station House Officer who proceeded to carry on search. Station House Officer has appeared as PD and in his statement also he has not come with any case that as required by the proviso to Sub-section 1 , he recorded his grounds of belief anywhere. The High Court after considering the entire evidence has made following observations : "Shishupal Singh PD by whom search has been conducted, on reaching at the place of occurrence by him no reasons to believe have been recorded before conducting the search of jeep bearing HR 24 under Section 42 1 , nor any reasons in regard to not obtaining the search warrant have been recorded.
He has also not stated any such facts in his statements that he has conducted any proceedings in regard to compliance of proviso of Section 42 1. Since reasons to believe have not been recorded, therefore, under Section 42 2 it is not found on record that copy thereof has been sent to the senior officials.
Shishupal Singh could be the best witness in this regard, who has not stated any fact in his statement regarding compliance of proviso to Section 42 1 and Section 42 2 , sending of copy of reasons to believe recorded by him to his senior officials.
In this context, it is relevant to note that before the Special Judge also the breach of Section 42 1 and 42 2 was contended on behalf of the defence. In paragraph 12 of the judgment Special Judge noted the above arguments of defence. However, the arguments based on non-compliance of Section 42 2 were brushed aside by observing that discrepancy in Exh. P- 14 and Exh. P is totally due to clerical mistake and there was compliance of Section 42 2. Special Judge coming to compliance of proviso to Section 42 1 held that vehicle searched was being used to transport passengers as has been clearly sated by its owner Veera Ram, hence, as per the explanation to Section 43 of the Act, the vehicle was a public transport vehicle and there was no need of any warrant or authority to search such a vehicle.
The High Court has reversed the above findings of the Special Judge. We thus, proceed to examine as to whether Section 43 was attracted in the present case which obviated the requirement of Section 42 1 proviso. Section 43 of the Act is as follows:. Power of seizure and arrest in public place. Explanation to Section 43 defines expression "public place" which includes any public conveyance. The word "public conveyance" as used in the Act has to be understood as a conveyance which can be used by public in general.
The Motor Vehicles Act, and thereafter the Motor Vehicles Act, were enacted to regulate the law relating to motor vehicles. The vehicles which can be used for public are public Motor Vehicles for which necessary permits have to be obtained. Without obtaining a permit in accordance with the Motor Vehicles Act, , no vehicle can be used for transporting passengers. In the present case, it is not the case of the prosecution that the jeep HR had any permit for transporting the passengers. The High Court has looked into the evidence and come to the conclusion that there was no material to indicate that there was any permit for running the jeep as public transport vehicle.
The High Court has further held that even Kartara Ram who as per owner of the vehicle Veera Ram was using the vehicle, do not support that the jeep was used as public transport vehicle.
The High Court held that personal jeep could not be treated as public transport vehicle. Following observations were made by the High Court: "Kartara Ram is produced as PD-5,who has deposed the statement that Vira Ram is his brother-in-law Saala , on whose name jeep bearing No. HR 24 is lying registered. He had employed Inderjit singh as driver for that jeep.
Person namely Krishan has never been employed as driver. This witness has been declared hostile and he has been examined too, who does not support the prosecution case.
In this manner, Viraram is the owner of the jeep. According to him he had given the jeep to Kartara Ram, but Kartara Ram has not stated anywhere in is statement that this jeep was given to him and he used the same as Public Transport Vehicle. If you play with hard-boiled eggs, players can start over if they drop their egg. If you play with raw eggs, players are out of the game if they drop their egg. The first player to cross the finish line with his egg on his spoon wins the game.
Give each player an old burlap sack or a pillowcase. Burlaps sacks are available online and at many feed stores. Use the same starting line and finish line as the egg race. Have a race for children and a race for adults. The first player across the finish line in her burlap sack or pillowcase wins the game.
0コメント